Social Media Legal Ethics

According to the rule, any lawyer who has been involved in a case cannot make extrajudicial statements that have a reasonable likelihood of public disclosure and that have a material adverse effect on the proceedings in the case. Therefore, the general rule requires that lawyers carefully avoid making statements to the media, via social media, or in any other way that could potentially affect the impartiality of a court case. Social media is here to stay, despite all its pros and cons, which is why it`s important for lawyers to learn how to manage it without violating rules of conduct and ethics. From Twitter to Facebook, by following the advice above, a lawyer should be able to avoid disciplinary action and potential violations. These rules and policies are constantly evolving to keep pace with technological advances, so the best thing a law firm can do is stay on top of their state`s mandates and shape office policies accordingly. Most lawyers would never intentionally fail in their ethical obligations. Instead, many ethical issues arise from accidental actions taken with the best of intentions. A better understanding of the potential ethical pitfalls of discussing litigation and other legal issues through different channels can help you stay on track and avoid disciplinary issues. If there`s one tip to avoid the biggest ethical issues for lawyers that can pop up on social media, it would be to keep your personal profile private. In addition to avoiding sharing content that could be considered legal advice.

Limiting the number of people who can find a lawyer`s profile, let alone the content that can be shared, reduces the risk of inadvertently violating the ABA`s rules and guidelines for ethical behavior on social media. When the founding fathers developed our American justice system, they could not understand the modern social landscape. In an era before electric lighting, the internet, social media, and today`s mainstream media machine were undoubtedly far from developing the law of the land. Nevertheless, media interest in litigation has increasingly influenced the legal profession in recent decades and, more recently, social media has begun to influence effective legal practice and administration of justice. Therefore, it is not surprising that lawyers do not disclose confidential information related to their current representation of clients in a litigation matter, either online or through traditional media. You need a customer`s consent before taking any action that could reveal sensitive information, even if that information is now part of the public record. (See: ABA Formal op. 18-480).

The question of the impact of social media on the Depp/Heard case remains the subject of public debate. It highlights the role that social media and mainstream media play in the justice system, particularly when it comes to active litigation cases. This rule may be interpreted as prohibiting any conduct that might undermine the appearance of impartiality in a contentious case. This means that lawyers must be very careful about any interaction on social media with judges, parties or witnesses, even if that interaction is just a public post or comment. This article focuses on lawyers and law firms that use social media for marketing and client development. It is not exhaustive and does not constitute legal advice. There are many other considerations regarding lawyers` ethical use of social media, including ex parte communication; fraudulent requests to collect information; failure to inform clients of the risks associated with the use of social networking sites; direct contact with an adverse party; and more. CN notices/rules are subject to change or update. To stay up to date, attorneys should check the advertising/marketing/advertising rules on the North Carolina State Bar Association`s website. The U.S. Supreme Court considers attorney advertising to be commercial speech worthy of First Amendment protection, as long as it is not false or misleading.

Several states view social media content focused on law firms as advertising for lawyers, thus ensuring its constitutional coverage. However, practitioners need to consider the inherent differences between social media advertising and more traditional forms in order to avoid harmful or deceptive practices. As another example of an ethical duty that could potentially affect a lawyer`s activities on social media or in other communications, ABA Model Rule 7.1 (Communications Concerning the Services of a Lawyer) prohibits a lawyer from providing false or misleading communications through his or her services. Lawyers should not promise results, market or distort their services. If you or your business has increased your participation in social media as part of your marketing efforts, there are a number of opinions and rules of business conduct that apply and should be reviewed in light of your efforts. There are many rules and opinions that apply to a law firm`s website – such as characterizing specialties and using testimonials – that should also be considered for your firm`s social presence. When a lawyer or his team investigates during the jury selection process, they are allowed to post public content on social media. However, you should not try to see something that is not available until special access has been granted. This means they don`t have to join private groups or send private messages to view restricted content. In addition, lawyers should exercise caution when speaking publicly about a contentious matter, whether with the media or someone else.

You must be careful to avoid statements that could be interpreted as an attempt to influence the outcome of the ongoing proceedings. Social Media Ethics for Lawyers Applies to Your Employees In addition to the above rules and opinions, the Wisconsin attorney offers some thoughts on additional risks to consider when marketing and communicating via social media. While the ABA makes it clear that a lawyer can advertise their services by any means, it is also explicitly clear that communications must be honestly and unambiguously identifiable as advertising services.