The ruling Kim family in North Korea (Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-un) has often been described as a de facto absolute monarchy or “family dictatorship.” However, the country officially refers to itself as the “Democratic People`s Republic of Korea”. Liechtenstein has moved towards an expansion of the monarch`s power: the Prince of Liechtenstein was given expanded powers after a referendum to amend Liechtenstein`s constitution in 2003, prompting the BBC to call the prince “an absolute monarch again”.  The dictator Kim Jong-Il of North Korea was a charismatic leader of an absolute dictatorship. His supporters reacted with emotion to the death of their leader in 2011. (Photo courtesy of babeltrave / Flickr) A monarchy is a system of government in which there is a king or queen who has absolute power of government and decision-making in that particular country. The term monarchy is a word derived from the Greek word “monarkhia”, which means “alone”. In the case of a monarchy, the succession of kings is a succession, that is, only members of the royal family can succeed in becoming king or queen and ruling over the people. No other person outside this family could become monarch. Aristotle was the first to define three main types of systems of government in the fourth century BC. These consisted of monarchy, aristocracy and politics. Since then, many more have been formulated, but the main themes and ideas have remained.
Today, the five most common systems of government are democracy, republic, monarchy, communism and dictatorship. This list describes what you need to know about each of them. Queen Noor of Jordan is the widowed queen of this constitutional monarchy and has limited political authority. Queen Noor was born in America but renounced her citizenship when she married. She is a well-known global advocate of Arab-Western relations. (Photo courtesy of Skoll World Forum/Flickr) In ancient Egypt, Pharaoh exercised absolute power over the land and was regarded by his people as a living god. In ancient Mesopotamia, many rulers of Assyria, Babylonia, and Sumer were also absolute monarchs. In ancient and medieval India, the rulers of the Maratha, Maurya, Satavahana, Gupta, Chola, Mughal and Chalukya empires, as well as other large and small empires, were considered absolute. Therefore, a monarchy in all possible circumstances would be preferable to a dictatorship from the point of view of the citizens. Indeed, in a monarchy, there is always an opportunity to protect the rights of the people, since the monarch could be bound by the constitution even in the case of a constitutional monarchy.
However, this is certainly not possible in a dictatorship, as the dictator would always prefer one community to another. To solve all the problems that exist in these two systems, democracy could be an effective solution because it ensures the proper participation of people in the decision-making process. Therefore, there is no room for their rights to be violated, as it would then be up to the state to enforce citizens` rights. Therefore, a democracy or a republican system of government is better than these two systems, but when comparing dictatorship and monarchy, monarchy would still be favored because it is slightly better in terms of protecting civil liberties. Im 17. In the nineteenth century, the French legal theorist Jean Domat defended the concept of absolute monarchy in works such as “On Social Order and Absolute Monarchy,” citing absolute monarchy as the preservation of the natural order as God intended.  Other intellectual figures who supported absolute monarchy were Thomas Hobbes and Charles Maurras. Some dictators also possess the personal appeal that Max Weber identified with a charismatic leader. The subjects of such a dictator may believe that the leader has special abilities or authority and is willing to submit to his authority. The late North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il and his successor Kim Jong-Un are examples of this kind of charismatic dictatorship.
An absolute ruler can be accepted because people believe or accept the idea that God has given him the right to rule. This belief is known as divine right, which has often been associated with a monarchy, a form of government in which the power of the king or queen is hereditary. A similar idea legitimized the Chinese emperor, whose reign was threatened when his subjects felt he had lost the “Mandate of Heaven.” Although this statement is highly controversial, Louis XIV de France (1638-1715) is said to have often proclaimed L`État, c`est moi!, “Je suis l`État!” Although he was often criticized for his extravagances, such as the Palace of Versailles, he long ruled the France, and some historians consider him a successful absolute monarch. More recently, revisionist historians have questioned whether Ludwig`s reign should be considered “absolute” given the reality of the balance of power between the monarch and the nobility, as well as the parliaments.  [citation needed for verification] One theory is that he built the opulent Palace of Versailles and preferred only the nobles who lived nearby to gather the nobility in Paris and concentrate power as a centralized government. This policy also had the effect of separating the nobles from their feudal armies. Dictatorship and monarchy are forms of government that are generally considered against the democratic system of government. In the past, it was used by royal families only to meet their personal needs. Nevertheless, some monarchs certainly thought about the well-being of the people and the peace thanks to which the monarchy survived in countries like Bhutan.